jump to navigation

MCSA Cloud Platform Certification; Path, Process, & Training

All That Is To Know About MCSA Cloud Platform Certification:

MCSA Certification:

MCSA or Microsoft Certified Solutions Associate is certification program introduced by Microsoft for the purpose of providing advanced Microsoft technology skills and knowledge to candidates seeking a prosperous career in IT environment. An MCSA Certification may further lead to more advanced Microsoft certifications.

MCSA Cloud Platform Certification:

MCSA has a large certification path sharing specific expertise in each path one of them us Cloud Platform Certification. This certification deals with the skills needed for technologies of Microsoft Cloud. Cloud technologies are comparatively more cost-effective and bring more significance to modern-day businesses.

Over the last few years, cloud technologies have become the most central part in IT infrastructure, altering the ways a business operates worldwide. No matter how big or small a company is it essentially relies on cloud platforms to accommodate and bring complex applications into effect. And in the years to come, the demand for cloud platforms will only increase.

If you are looking to enhance your cloud computing skills or a newbie learning the basics an MCSA Cloud Platform Certification can pave the way to success for you. It will equip you with the most up-to-date skills set to handle enterprise core operations.
According to research, the demand for cloud experts has increased significantly over the years and employers are having a hard time finding cloud technicians who are skilled enough for the job. A Cloud Platform Certification will be able to help you develop those skills in high demand.

Many big IT Organizations are looking for cloud engineers with professional skills to handle their infrastructure through adequate cloud computing. Cloud engineers are earning big and a proper cloud platform training will lead you to the right direction of a prosperous future and will definitely enhance your earning potential. Gaining the latest skills in cloud computing means landing those jobs easily.

Candidates interested in MCSA: Cloud Platform Certification must have the basic knowledge to design, program, implement and monitor Microsoft Azure solutions and a minimum 2 years practical experience in these things plus a year or more experience with web designing with basic networking know-how.

 

Certification Exams to pursue Cloud Platform Certification are as follows:

70-532 Complete Exam Overview:

The 70-532 Developing Microsoft Azure Solutions Certification Exam validates the following skills and knowledge of the candidate:
• Create and manage Azure Resource Manager Virtual Machines (30-35%)
• Design and implement a storage and data strategy (25-30%)
• Manage identity, application, and network services (15-20%)
• Design and implement Azure PaaS compute and web and mobile services (25-30%).

Eligible candidates for 70-532 Certification Exam are the ones experienced to design, program, implement and monitor Microsoft Azure Solutions. Other than that, the candidate must be able to provide an adaptable and volatile solution using suitable development tools, techniques and methods.

Using updated and valid set of 70-532 Dumps you can easily manage to nail all these skills and secure significant marks. Dumsppdf 70-532 PDF Dumps are perfect for this cause. They have been carefully selected and fulfill the purpose wonderfully.

Important Note: Microsoft is changing this certification as per improvement measures. In that event, 70-532 Certification Exam will be replaced with two new exams (AZ-200 Microsoft Azure Developer Core Solutions & Exam AZ-201 Microsoft Azure Developer Advanced Solutions) for more advanced knowledge for Azure Development role. The 70-532 Certification Exam retires on 31st December 2018. For Complete Exam Information:

https://www.dumpspdf.com/70-532.html

 

70-533 Complete Exam Overview:

The 70-533 Implementing Microsoft Azure Infrastructure Solutions Certification Exam is meant for the candidates who have already experienced creating a feasible solution for Microsoft Azure. Plus, they have experience of applying and managing cloud as well as hybrid solutions. Following are the skills that are measured through this certification exam:
• Design and Implement Azure App Service Apps (10-15%)
• Create and Manage Azure Resource Manager Virtual Machines (20-25%)
• Design and Implement a Storage Strategy (10-15%)
• Implement Virtual Networks (15-20%)
• Design and Deploy ARM Templates (10-15%)
• Manage Azure Security and Recovery Services (25-30%)
• Manage Azure Operations (5-10%)
• Manage Azure Identities (5-10%)

Dumpspdf is the best source to get suitable 70-533 Dumps Questions for practice. These 70-533 Real Exam Dumps provides Grade a platform to pass the test in just one attempt. You can learn all the basic and advanced Azure Developer skills with 70-533 Dumps PDF.
Important Note: Microsoft is changing this certification as per improvement measures. In that event, 70-533 Certification Exam will be replaced with two new exams (AZ-200 Microsoft Azure Developer Core Solutions & AZ-201 Microsoft Azure Developer Advanced Solutions) for more advanced knowledge for Azure Administration role. The 70-533 Certification Exam retires on 31st December 2018.

 

70-535 Complete Exam Overview:

The 70-535 Architecting Microsoft Azure Solutions Certification Exam in the measure of candidate’s ability to define basic cloud infrastructure, its passage and hybrid solutions in order to fulfill the practical, operative and implementation requirements of solution lifecycle.

The candidate must be fully familiar with all Azure Services characteristics and know-how in order to identify medium and come to appropriate decisions regarding the design of public and hybrid cloud solutions.

To be 100% accurate on your Architecting Microsoft Azure Solutions Certification Exam performance you will need best 70-535 Exam Dumps curated by a reliable source such as Dumpspdf . Let our expertly created 70-535 Practice Questions pave the way to your success.

Moreover, he should be aware of DevOps technologies, material Azure resources using ARM templates, and designing highly flexible assignments to run on Azure.

 

Important Note: Microsoft is changing this certification as per improvement measures. In that event, 70-535 Certification Exam will be replaced with two new exams (AZ-300: Microsoft Azure Architect Technologies & AZ-301: Microsoft Azure Architect Design) for more advanced knowledge for Azure Architecture role. The 70-535 Certification Exam retires on 31st December 2018.

 

70-537 Complete Exam Overview:

The 70-537 Configuring and Operating a Hybrid Cloud with Microsoft Azure Stack Certification Exam candidates are able to manage and operate Azure Stack environments. In order to be eligible for the 70-537 certification exam, a candidate must be well conversant of Azure along with virtualization, networking and identity management. To add, the candidate must also know how Azure assists DevOps practices and hybrid expansion model.

Following are the skills measured for this certification exam:

Deploying and Integrating an Azure Stack Environment (20-25%)
Configuring PaaS and IaaS for an Azure Stack Environment (25-30%)
Providing Services to and Enabling DevOps for Azure Stack Tenants (25-30%)
Maintaining and Monitoring an Azure Stack Environment (20-25%)

Candidates deemed eligible for 70-537 Certification Exam fulfill the requirements of planning, deploying, packaging, updating and maintaining full Azure Stack Set-up. In addition, the candidate must also prove the ability to provide proper hybrid cloud resources and demanded services. Plus, must be able to manage the whole infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS).

Dumpspdf is offering an impeccable set of 70-537 Practice Exam Questions. Training through these assures your success with one attempt. You will be able skillfully manage Azure Stack environment in no time with these brilliant 70-537 PDF Dumps.

The target of the certification are the Azure administrators and Azure Stack Operators who using Azure Stack deliver cloud services to their customers and end users contained by their own data centre.

A Full-fledged Guide to Pass Google Cloud Certified Professional Data Engineer Exam Certification Exam in One Attempt

Do You Know the Secret to Pass Professional Data Engineer Certification Exam in Just One Attempt?

Have you applied for Professional Data Engineer Certification Exam? Are you sure you can pass? As you must have had heard about the Google Certifications they are generally very hard and complicated. Why? Because they have a build a standard in the IT Industry and to maintain it they need to be competitive. Mostly thousands of students apply for Professional Data Engineer Certification Exam every year but not all of them pass the exam in the first attempt. They fail and try again but you can avoid that. How? Keep on reading and you’ll know that soon.

There is a specific technology a pattern that Google Certifications follow and you will need an expert’s help to easily get by the Professional Data Engineer Certification Exam. A proper method to prepare for the said exam is Professional Data Engineer PDF Dumps. And you can find dependable Professional Data Engineer Dumps at Dumps4free. We offer a very accurately prepared Professional Data Engineer Dumps Questions for those who seek assistance for passing their exam. By joining us you can get proper guidance to pass this exam.

Google Professional data engineer Dumps

Genuine Professional Data Engineer Braindumps with an Attractive User-Interface:

There are so many other websites that are also providing Professional Data Engineer Dumps PDF then why should you choose us what is it in Dumps4free.com that makes us the more desirable source? Let me get this straight you may find many Dump Vendors but all of them not sell Professional Data Engineer Real Exam Dumps they are fabricated products with some false information but we don’t risk your future like that we provide our service to your best interest and that is why give you Google Professional Data Engineer Practice Questions made up of actual Certification Exam Content. Plus, an attractive user-interface to keep you interested in practicing for your exam.

professional Data engineerBraindumps

Latest & Easily Available Professional Data Engineer Practice Exam Questions:

Owing to the growing need for advanced technologies Google has always been subtle to change certain things in their exams to make them according to the market trend. We by following their routinely updating keep our Professional Data Engineer Sample Questions up-to-date as well. All the Free Professional Data Engineer Exam Questions are according to the latest patterns and deliver a real-like atmosphere for you to practice in.

To keep you updated with upcoming challenges of Certification Exam we have taken certain measures to make them easily accessible to you. There is no need to work yourself up with long subscription procedures for getting Professional Data Engineer PDF all you need to do is click a button and start your training. Other than this we have been considerate of the candidates who do not have a regular online connection and so have made PDF Dumps available offline. You can download them and even if you want a hard copy you can have it with no trouble just by printing Google Dumps.

Free professiona cloud Engineer Discount code

Affordable and Simple Professional Data Engineer Dumps Questions for your Exam Preparation :

Another thing that set Dumps4free apart is the fact that we do not request the big amount of money in exchange for our Professional Data Engineer Braindumps. You can have them within your budget as they are extremely affordable. We don’t want to put you in any problems. That is why we made Google Professional Data Engineer Exam Preparation easy by inscribing Data Engineer Real Exam Dumps such that each word delivers it full meaning. No important concept of Google Certification Exam been left behind.

You can study for your Certification Exam without a care in the world. Also, to demonstrate the full subject matter, we added a precise but clear column at the end of Professional Data Engineer Dumps PDF. You can understand the full concept of the question and know why the selected answer was correct too.

try free demo Dumps

Free Updates for Full Three Month with Professional Data Engineer Practice Questions Purchase :

What more could you need with the Professional Data Engineer Practice Exam Questions purchase to have 3 month updates absolutely free. During these 3 months if Google makes any changes in the exam Dumps4free will update the Sample Questions as soon as possible. To have you fully convinced of the advantage of using our Free Professional Data Engineer Exam Questions we offer Free Demo and Trials as well. Now you can confirm the accuracy and see if these Google Dumps suits your requirement or not before you decide to buy.
We give our customer the number one priority and that said can be proved by the tons of appreciative testimonials our satisfied customers send us every day. You can have a look around for them on our official website. And still, if you have any problems or want to ask a few things about the Professional Data Engineer Certification Exam, contact our customer care service.

All You Need To Know To Applying For 70-535 – Architecting Microsoft Azure Solutions Exam

Do you intend to apply for 70-535 Architecting Microsoft Azure Solutions Exam?

If you are then its good and if not by the end of this article if not 100% you will be 95% convinced that you should apply for this particular Exams. For your ease in making a full-proof decision, we have compiled a list of things that are essential to know before you go ahead and apply for the said exam. Let’s start with an overview of the Microsoft Azure Certification and its Exams. That way you will be able to understand better what this certification is and what it aims at.

Microsoft Azure Certification Overview:

Microsoft is a big name in IT industry other than providing us with fabulous software’s such as Windows Operating System and Office Software this organization also aims at bringing many of the candidates to light upon their infrastructure and other programs one of the ways to do it id through Certification Exam and thus Microsoft introduced a Certification Program to increase your knowledge regarding different Microsoft Technologies one of them is Microsoft Azure Certifications. It is one of the newest certification of the Microsoft based on Azure Cloud Platforms.  Microsoft Azure is a cloud for current Enterprises. It gives you the knowledge of Azure vertical machines and networks, PaaS (Platform as a service), managing applications and migrating on-premises systems to the cloud. Microsoft Azure Certifications enhances your skills to ace your cloud working performance. Most of the prominent organization run their business depending on Cloud and thus by acquiring a certification such as Microsoft Azure can help you land a fabulous job in no time. It incredibly enhances your chances to acquire a job that demands basic as well as expert cloud knowledge.

70-535 is an upgraded version of previously launched Architecting Azure Solution Certification Exams such as 70-534. 70-534 went through numerous updates and then it was decided to change the number of the Exam by Microsoft and thus 70-535 was revealed.

70-535 Architecting Microsoft Azure Solution Exam is a 150 minutes Exam containing 40 to 60 number of Multiple Choice Questions as well as some of Proctored and Caselet based Questions. The total cost on the exam is estimated as approx. 165 US Dollars. The Exam is free of any perquisites through a basic cloud knowledge in must to begin your Exam Preparations. The candidate needs to attain 70% marks to pass the exam.

70-535 is the best choice for IT Professionals who require Software or Solution Architect Skills. As this exam is Architecture Based it is thus on a higher level than other Azure Certification Exams such as 70-532 Developing Azure Solutions and 70-533 Implementing Azure Solutions.

 

70-535 – Architecting Microsoft Azure Solutions Exam Topics:

 

Following are some of the topics covered by the 70-535 Certification Exam:

 

 

 

 

Preparing For 70-535 Architecting Microsoft Azure Solutions Exam:

Now when you know mostly everything about the exam we come down to the question of how to prepare for it?

One of the best and tested way of learning for any certification exam is through Practice Exam Questions that can be easily available as studying guides or online Practice Tests. But to guarantee your success you need to make sure that your resource is 100% valid and accurate. Only then you will be able to properly train yourself for the exam exceptionally and bring out marvelous result.

Dumps4free.com is one of those resources that promises a great success in First attempt with minimum effort. Try their 70-535 Practice Test Questions Answers if you also want to ace the exam.

Dumps4free For 70-535 Practice Exam Dumps:

Once you are free of your studies and divert your attention towards gaining a certification you will need a proved and certified source to complete your training towards attaining your goal. Dumps4free.com provides the best study material for all certification exams specifically our 70-535 PDF Questions are a piece of art. Buy our easy to understand and compatible 70-535 Practice Exam Questions to achieve highest ranking scores in your first attempt. Our Practice Questions are verified by famous IT Professionals who have mastered their skills for years in this field. Study from our 70-535 Test Questions and you will surely be successful in no time.

Latest & Accurate set of 70-535 Practice Test Questions:

Dumps4free.com provides latest and accurate 70-535 Test Practice Questions according to your Exam content to elevate your chances of getting highest possible marks. We have benefited thousands of students in achieving their dreams. You can see in our testimonials section as a proof of how candidates have accomplished their dreams using our Practice Tests.

Our Reliable and committed team is set 24 hours at your services they make sure that you don’t miss out on any of the latest updates on your exam, so they keep a keen eye on every recent update and keep 70-535 Practice Test Questions Answers up-to-date.

You can contact us anytime through our customer care service. Our Practice Exam Questions are also available for Download or Print and you can also see a demo or avail our trial period to contemplate whether our product fulfills all your needs or not.

UCOP’s Latest Threat to Faculty Freedom

Subject: UCOP’s Latest Threat to Faculty Freedom
By Rei Terada (UCI) and Robert Meister (UCSC)UCOP has proposed changes to the Academic Personnel Manual concerning faculty rights and discipline of faculty conduct. They are posted for comment athttp://www.ucop.edu/acadpersonnel/apm/review.html, and they need attention. A close reading of the proposed changes suggests that they enlarge in an unlimited manner the zone in which faculty are exposed to “administrative actions” without the due process specified by the Faculty Code of Conduct. Recently, three UC faculty have been charged with criminal offenses related to protesting UC policies: Celeste Langan of UC Berkeley, whose charges have since been dropped; Ken Ehrlich of UC Riverside; and Joshua Clover of UC Davis. None of them have yet been subjected to university discipline under the Faculty Code of Conduct. Could these events be related? Yes, indeed. By the logic of one of the changes proposed, in the future the university could discipline faculty in their position outside the guidelines of the Faculty Code of Conduct and without any peer review whatsoever.
UCOP here proposes changes to three sections of the APM: APM-010 on Academic Freedom; APM-015, Part I of the Faculty Code of Conduct, on Professional Rights of Faculty; and APM-016, University Policy on Faculty Conduct and Administration of Discipline. The proposed changes begin promisingly. To a sentence in APM-010 naming the freedoms that faculty currently enjoy–“freedom of inquiry and research, freedom of teaching, and freedom of expression and publication”—is added a new “freedom,” “freedom to address any matter of institutional policy or action when acting as a member of the faculty whether or not as a member of an agency of institutional governance.” It’s true that APM-015 already states that professors “maintain their right to criticize and seek revision” of University regulations” (APM-015, Part II C). But this statement has turned out not to be enough to protect faculty in all cases. In a recent federal lawsuit (Hong v. Grant), the Regents zealously and successfully defended UC Irvine for denying a merit increase to a Professor on the grounds that he publicly criticized his department for relying on adjuncts to teach required courses. The Ninth Circuit upheld UC’s position on the narrow grounds that “[i]t is far from clearly established …that university professors have a First Amendment right to comment on faculty administrative matters without retaliation.” Thus, in the new 015 UC seems to back down on its claimed right to retaliate against faculty who criticize it. The next proposed change, to APM-015, adds the new “freedom” a second time, in exactly the same language, to the list of Professional Rights in the Code of Conduct (“the right to present controversial material relevant to a course of instruction” and so forth). This “freedom” protects UC professors from being formally disciplined under the Faculty Code of Conduct for mere criticism of UC policy.
It is unclear, however, whether UC still claims the power to retaliate against its critics outside the Code. The proposed revision to APM-016, which deals with The Administration of Discipline, expands exactly such an area external to the Code of Conduct. To a sentence on the kinds of trivial sanctions to which faculty can be subject “like all other members of the University community,” it simply adds the word “policies”: “faculty members are subject to the general rules and regulations and policies of the University; such as these include, but are not limited to, those pertaining to parking, library privileges, health and safety, and use of University facilities. Faculty are subject to appropriate administrative actions for failure to comply with such rules and regulations and policies” (strikeout indicates deleted language; italics indicate new language). This passage of APM-016 involves those kinds of violations for which “faculty members may be subject to certain administrative actions which are outside the scope of faculty discipline” (our italics). These are “administrative actions” that don’t have to abide by the procedures specified by the Faculty Code of Conduct. The campus doesn’t have to meet the standards of the Code of Conduct to issue a parking ticket or a library fine. In this category, UCOP claims that it just wants to cover “failure to comply” with “policies” as well, since we’ve now acquired a new freedom to express disagreements with these “policies.”

But things are much more complicated. We must understand that the University already has two channels of disciplinary action available: the Faculty Code of Conduct, which under APM-015 requires “significant faculty involvement,” and “other forms of reproval or administrative actions” (APM-015, Part II) “in addition” (016), which do not require significant faculty involvement. The passage of the current 016 we cited above reads in full:

With respect to the imposition of disciplinary sanctions, the Faculty Code of Conduct deals only with the professional responsibilities, ethical principles, and standards of conduct that pertain to the professional obligations of faculty members. No disciplinary sanctions described in this policy may be imposed on faculty members other than through the procedures pursuant to this policy and the Faculty Code of Conduct. In addition, faculty members may be subject to certain administrative actions which are outside the scope of faculty discipline.

The sentence about library fines and parking tickets follows. Placing failure to comply with “policies” here in APM-016, instead of among the types of acts subject to Code of Conduct procedures, then, is to place them outside the area of “significant faculty involvement”and the Code of Conduct’s formal consistency (including full recourse to the Academic Senate’s Committee on Privilege and Tenure).

Now, it is not clear how a “policy” differs from a rule or regulation. “Policies” could, potentially, be narrowly defined so as not to intrude on faculty rights or go beyond existing rules. But the current language does not do so, and faculty requests for clarification to the chairs of the Academic Senates at UCI and UCLA have received no response to the question of what “policies” means since April 6. The Irvine Faculty Association has been told that its Committee on Faculty Welfare, charged with considering the changes, has received no enlightenment and can give none on how a policy differs from a rule.

As a matter of jurisprudence, “policy” is often used to designate a general goal that is implemented by “rules.” So, UC may have policies such as privatization or increasing out-of-state enrollment or borrowing against tuition funds to construct buildings. UC can adopt and write up these policies at a high level—they are best understood as reflecting the administration’s priorities, and are frequently implemented by means of the budget. Implementing these policies by means of rules with which individual faculty members are expected to “comply” would require much more intensive Academic Senate review and could raise issues of conflict with principle, such as that of academic freedom.

The current changes imply, however, that “policies” in this broad sense can be treated as rules at UC’s discretion, without any of the normal safeguards that would accompany implementing policies by means of rules. A further source of ambiguity is that, while failure to comply with a rule means violating it, non-compliance with a policy frequently takes the form of resisting or undermining it. Such resistance can remain within the rules, but not if faculty can be sanctioned for “failure to comply” with an underlying policy whether or not it takes the form of a rule.

With respect to sanctions that, unlike library fines, must follow the Code’s procedures, the current APM-015 sets forth “a clear distinction” between “(1) ethical principles and (2) types of unacceptable behavior.” The APM’s positive ethical principles draw on other professional documents that go back a long way. “They are aspirational in character, and represent objectives toward which faculty members should strive”:

University discipline under this Code may be imposed on a faculty member only for conduct which is not justified by the ethical principles and which significantly impairs the University’s central functions as set forth in the Preamble. To the extent that violations of University policies mentioned in the examples below are not also inconsistent with the ethical principles, these policy violations may not be independent grounds for imposing discipline as defined herein. (APM-015, Part II)

APM-015 also notes that “professors observe the stated regulations of the institution, provided the regulations do not contravene academic freedom” (our italics; Part II, C). APM-016, in contrast, superficially seems to treat events that have no political significance. Are “policies,” however, especially policies with which one might want to exercise one’s freedom to disagree publicly as APM 015 now allows, ever without such significance? Assuming, according to the APM’s proposed new invitation to disagree verbally in 015, that we are talking about such policies throughout the proposed changes, UCOP wants the ability to disregard the ethical significance of resisting such policies by placing them under 016 instead of 015. According to 015, it’s impossible to penalize through the given process conduct that is justified by the Code’s own Ethical Principles. But in the new 016, even these would be susceptible to “other forms of reproval or administrative actions.” As though taking a cue from the Department of Homeland Security, the “policies” that fall into the no-man’s land of administrative exception from the Code are completely unlimited in the proposed language. Taken together, the positive and punitive proposals are saying: disagree verbally with the policies if you like, but comply with (don’t resist) them or else. In other words: talk all you like, because that’s not going to matter.

Now, the Faculty Code of Conduct is already quite restrictive with regard to protest at the University. The faculty who have recently received criminal charges may already be sanctionable under the Code through its provisions ruling out the “disruption” of University business (APM-015, Part II C). On the other hand, the APM is peskily ambiguous in its acknowledgment of areas where the principles it sets forth may collide—most of all in the phrase we quoted above, which recognizes the existence ofregulations that do contravene academic freedom. The proposed changes would extend beyond disciplining disruption and would no longer recognize a place for either active or passive nonverbal resistance to policies. Despite the new language’s proximity to trivial and distracting examples of parking tickets and the like, there is every reason not to enlarge in an unlimited manner the zone in which faculty are exposed to “administrative actions” without the oversight of their peers; without what due process is provided by the Code; and even if their resistance takes the form of mobilizing against policies that “contravene academic freedom.”

The proposed amendment to APM 016 should not be modified, but scrapped. We urge UC faculty to contact the chairs of their Academic Senates before the comment period ends on June 12.

CUCFA response to Gov. Brown and UCOP Yudof

UC President Mark Yudof and Governor Jerry Brown are working out a deal behind closed doors that will loosen the most important ties between the university and the state.

Although they will both praise the deal by saying that it “stabilizes” funding while granting greater “flexibility” for students answering LSAT Questions, its essence is that each will let the other off the hook: UC will mute complaints that it does not get enough money from the state and the state will stop holding UC accountable for the money it still gets.

The likely result is that UC will dump a larger number of eligible Californians onto the CSU and Community Colleges, which will in turn pass on their overflow to for-profit schools, where students take on inordinate amounts of debt with a very high likelihood of default.

Here are some key elements of the deal:

* UC will continue to raise tuition-at least 6% based on the Governor’s January budget proposal, likely more now that the Governor’s May revise reduces UC funding by $38 million, and much more if the Governor’s fall tax initiative fails to pass. (http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/regents/regmeet/may12/f8.pdf, pg. 2)

* UC will no longer promise the state that it will admit a fixed number of California students in return for the enrollment funding that the state provides. For next year, and presumably from now on, UC will be allowed to use taxpayer funding as it pleases, without being accountable for the number of in-state students it educates (http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/highered/higher-ed-020812.pdf, pg. 19). This means that UC is likely to enroll fewer California students, and to replace them with out-of-state and international students who pay more. The likely result is that UC will be able make more on average from its enrollments, that the state is likely to pay less, and that middle-income Californians will get less access to UC.

* UC will henceforward be allowed to commingle the state funds it uses for operations, such as teaching, with the funds it uses to pay debt service on new construction (http://www.dof.ca.gov/documents/2012-13_May_Revision.pdf, pg 43). UC has said that this added “flexibility” in its use of both state and non-state funds will allow it to squeeze out more for operations by delaying or stopping unnecessary construction projects. But since 2004 it has been doing the opposite, squeezing operational budgets that could be funded by higher tuition to leverage more construction. The state should have held UC accountable for its use of higher tuition on California students to gain greater access to the Airborne School construction bond markets, which were impressed by its ability to increase enrollments while raising prices. Instead, the state will give UC carte blanche in its use of both state and non-state funds. It might use this greater flexibility to spend more on construction. But from now on no one will ask, and no one will know.

Finally, UC will be able to say that how much it spends to educate Californians and how many of them it enrolls is its own business, and not the state’s. If UC thinks its traditional mission is a money-loser, it can now use its continuing, but declining, revenues from the state to diversify into fields where it sees a brighter future. It will not be expected to draw on its other, more entrepreneurial, activities to subsidize public higher education, but instead will be allowed to use state educational funds to subsidize these other activities — and especially the capital projects necessary to get them off the ground.

The core of the agreement between the Governor and UC is that UC will no longer be held accountable for its priorities in the use of any of its resources (public or private) — and especially for making it a priority to educate Californians.

Under Governor Schwarzenegger, UC got the state to agree that it should provide only as much public higher education for Californians as the state is willing to pay for. Under Governor Brown it will be free to provide even less than the state is willing to pay for. Unless this agreement is reversed, state funding for UC will continue to fall as UC separates itself from the rest of California’s Master Plan. We are reaching the point of no return.

Davis Dozen update

update: new court date in June (As someone who studies social movements, the delay tactics here are fairly familiar. constant delays make it hard for everyone, even passive supporters, to keep track of what is happening, especially as the end of the quarter approaches).

here’s the update on the UCD countersuit against US Bank for Breach of Contract

UC Security culture

today’s guest post is from Susan Kaiser in Women and Gender Studies
Dear colleagues,
When I read the fascinating article Suad Joseph shared about the May Day “warning,” I was trying to figure out why I didn’t remember receiving that message from UCOP, so I started searching… The Aljazeera article cites an earlier article in The Nation:
http://www.thenation.com/blog/167642/may-day-warning-u-cal-president-avoid-all-protests
Then I found this article in The Daily Californian indicating it wasn’t Yudof or UC, but rather iJet (the private risk management and intelligencecompany—known as “the CIA for businesses”):

UCOP says that Yudof warning travelers to avoid May Day protests was false


So, if we book travel with Connexxus, we’re automatically linked to iJet, who gets our itinerary. Or if we get travel insurance, it’s coordinated with iJet, apparently since 2009:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/university-of-california-system-implements-ijets-worldcue-solutions-for-travel-resiliency-61845872.html
UC travelers will also receive warnings about “travel conditions,” including anticipated protests and other “threats,” as well as earthquakes, etc. The goal seems to be to reduce liability for the university, as the following blurbs from the iJet website indicate:
TRAVEL RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODELTM (TRM3TM)
Duty to Disclose: This concept focuses on an organization’s responsibility to monitor and disclose potential risks. For example, if there is ongoing civil unrest in a city, an organization has an obligation to disclose this to travelers so that they can make an informed decision about whether or not to take the trip. An organization could claim that it did not have knowledge of this risk, but then a court would likely ask, “Should the organization have known?” Given the number of available sources of information, including free sources such as government travel warnings and cable news as well as relatively low-cost services such as those offered by iJET and others, a claim of ignorance may not hold up in court.
iJET supports clients across a broad range of industries, including:

Universities aren’t mentioned on this list, but in an interview, one of iJet’s directors does mention them:
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2011-03-06/news/bs-bz-interview-ed-daly-20110306_1_ijet-clients-situations
As a client of iJet, UC (presumably UCOP and UC Chancellors and VC, such as Meyer) receive daily “briefings” regarding hot spots around the world–including our campuses and cities presumably. This may well set the stage for, and contribute to, a culture/mentality of (in)security, fear, anxiety in the UC administration…
Oh, and iJet is in Annapolis, Maryland, and its employees include ex-spis. The company does some of the kinds of things that the CIA used to do but is now outsourcing.
Anyway, yet another example of privatization–and a rather creepy one that seems to explain something about UC’s culture of (in)security… On the surface it may be about “travel risk management,” but if there are daily briefings/alerts, etc. that include warnings about potential civil disobedience, it can’t be that good…

Susan